Priyanka Kumari @ Priyanka Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15482 of 2022 ====================================================== Priyanka Kumari @ Priyanka Devi Wife of Niraj Kumar, resident of VillageSaidabad, P.O.-Mohanpur, P.S.-Raghopur, Sub-Division-Hajipur, DistrictVaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Collector, Vaishali. 2.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Hajipur (Vaishali). 3.

The Programme Officer, Hajipur (Vaishali).

4.

The Child Welfare Project Officer, Raghopur, Vaishali. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Raghopur (Vaishali). 6.

The Child Welfare Project Officer, Hajipur, District- Vaishali 7.

The Woman Coordinator, Social Welfare Department, Child Development Services Directorate Child Development Project Officer, Raghopur, DistrictVaishali. 8.

Urmila Devi, Wife of Prabhu Paswan, resident of Ward No. 7, Saidabad, P.O.-Mohanpur, P.S.-Raghopur, District-Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhusudan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. Raisul Haque (SC-10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That the prayer in this writ petition is to quash the memo No.1123 dated 18.12.2019 issued by Sushma Kumari, Woman Coordinator Officer of Child Development Project Officer, Raghopur, District-Vaishali by which the respondent No.8 (Urmila Devi)

Patna High Court CWJC No.15482 of 2022(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 has been selected for the post of Sahayika though she has not fulfilled the terms and conditions of selection committee."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U