Mahesh Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40244 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2005 Thana -SANHOLA District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Mahesh Mandal, Son of late Kripal Mandal @ Tirpal Mandal, Resident of village - Nanokhar, P.S. Sanhaulla, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiwesh Chandra Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03/ 29-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged against the petitioner that the petitioner assaulted the mother of the informant with spade as a result of which the mother of the informant succumbed to the injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the informant is not an eye-witness to the occurrence and earlier bail application was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to renew the prayer for bail if the trial will

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40244 of 2014 (3) dt.29-07-2015 2/2 not be concluded within a period of nine months. This Court is disposing of the bail application of the petitioner in view of the report of learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur dated 28.02.2015 at Flag 'A' to the effect that the trial is likely to be concluded within a period of four months. Though the said time frame has already lapsed. It is expected from the learned trial court to conclude Sessions Trial No. 1110 of 2012/T.R. No. 149 of 2012 arising out of Sanhaulla P.S. Case No. 131 of 2005 expeditiously, if it has not been concluded as yet then it may be concluded within a period of six weeks.

If the trial will not concluded with the stipulated period, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew the prayer for bail.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T