Lalu Prasad Sahu @ Lalu Prasad Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70695 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2020 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ====================================================== LALU PRASAD SAHU @ LALU PRASAD SAH S/o Ram Bilas Sahu R/o village- Siktiyahi, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Khutauna, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jay Prakash Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 354, 379, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of closing drain behind the house of the informant by the accused persons, the present occurrence took place as informant protested, it is next alleged that petitioner along with Shiv Shankar assaulted with spade on head of the informant's wife, son and daughter causing injury, it is further submitted that even the wife of the informant was assaulted and her golden chain was snatched.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70695 of 2021(2) dt.01-08-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are agnates and the present occurrence took place on account of land dispute relating to closing of drain. It is further submitted that from the side of petitioners also Khutauna P.S. Case No. 43 of 2020 was instituted in which people have suffered injuries. It is next submitted that injuries suffered by the informant are simple in nature and petitioners are not criminals.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 41 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T