Dharamveer Kumar @ Dharamveer Kumar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64746 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2024 Thana- ARIYARI District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== DHARAMVEER KUMAR @ DHARAMVEER KUMAR MANJHI S/O RAJKUMAR MANJHI R/o Village- Bisayhyiya Sanaiya Tola, P.S.- Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Rinku Devi Wie of Jitendra Manjhi R/o Village- Bisayhyiya Sanaiya Tola, P.S.- Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-11-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No.104 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

As per the FIR, petitioner and others are said to have kidnapped the daughter of informant.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64746 of 2024(3) dt.21-11-2024 2/2 petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that the victim is a minor and has supported the prosecution case in her statement recorded u/s 164 of Cr.PC.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. 7.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T