Pramod Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1696 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 129 of 2016 =========================================================== Pramod Kumar Pandey, son of Late Badri Pandey, resident of village- Barki Delha, Rajakothi, P.O. Railway Station, Gaya, P.S. - Delha, District- Gaya. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar,

2. Principal Secretary, Education Department, (formerly known as Human Resources Development Department), Government of Bihar, Patna,

3. The Secretary, Primary Education, Education Department, (formerly known as Human Resources Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. District Mgistrate, Gaya.

6. District Programme Officer, Establishment, (formerly District Superintendent of Education), Gaya.

7. Area Education Officer, Sadar, Gaya

8. Headmaster, Government Middle School, Kujapi Nagar, Prakhand Gaya, District- Gaya

9. Smt. Lalmani Devi, wife of Late Shiv Narayan Pandey, resident of Village- Barki Delha, Rajakothi, P.O. Railway Station, Gaya, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya

10. Smt. Gayatri Devi, wife of Sri Rmraj Tiwary, resident of Village- Pouthu, P.O. Jamhaur, (Pouthu), P.S. Jamhaur, District- Aurangabad (Bihar.) .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Gyanand Roy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, A.C. to PAAG-1 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 08-05-2017 Without challenging the original order dated 31.01.2012 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11178 of 2010 the only order of review passed on 27.07.2016 in Civil Review No. 129 of 2016 is not maintainable.

Patna High Court LPA No.1696 of 2016 dt.08-05-2017 2/2 Even if this appeal, for argument sake, is allowed, the original order passed on 31.01.2012 in C.W.J.C. No. 11178 of 2010 will always stand and so long as the said order stands, no benefit can be granted to the appellant.

Accordingly, finding this appeal to be not maintainable, as the appellant has not challenged the original order dated 31.01.2012 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11178 of 2010, we dismiss the appeal.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 11.05.2017 Transmission Date