Dr.K.N.Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17350 of 2014 ====================================================== Dr. K.N.Singh, Son of Shri Bhuneshwari Singh, C/o Rameshwar Bhagat, resident of Ahiyapur Chouck, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Managing Committee, D.A.V. College, Chitragupta Road, New Delhi through its Director.

4. The Director, D.A.V. College, Chitragupta Road, New Delh

5. The Disciplinary Authority, D.A.V. College, Chitragupta Road, New Delh

6. The Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi through its Chairman.

7. The Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Parth Sarthi (GA-11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT 22-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner had moved this Court against an order of suspension passed by the authorities of the D.A.V. School and that during pendency of this writ application, he has already been dismissed from service, this writ application has obviously become infructuous, specially, when such writ application against the D.A.V. School is not at all maintainable in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Santosh Kumar vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. reported in 2013(1)

Patna High Court CWJC No.17350 of 2014 (2) dt.22-07-2015 2/2 PLJR 269.

3. As a matte of fact, if the petitioner has filed another writ application, being C.W.J.C. No. 6664 of 2015, against the order of dismissal from service again assailing the order of the authorities of the D.A.V. School even that writ application will not be maintainable but then this Court would not like to say any more about that writ application, save and except, learned counsel for the Respondents shall have liberty to bring this order to the notice of the court at the time of hearing of C.W.J.C. No. 6664 of 2015.

4. This writ application is accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U