Patna High CourtMJC/201/2013dismissed

Ramayan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-19Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.201 of 2013 (3) dt.19-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.201 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11328 of 2012 ====================================================== Ramayan Prasad Singh About 69 Years S/O Late Bharti Prasad Singh Resident Of Mohalla Indrapuri, Saristabad, Police Station Gardanibag, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Amerjeet Sinha, The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Arun Kumar, The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

3. Sri D.K. Yadav, The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

4. Sri Diwesh Kumar Sinha, The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

5. Sri S.K. Sharma, The Principal, Gaya College, Gaya. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Asit Kumar Jha, A.C. to G.P.6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2016 No one appears for the petitioner.

The direction of this court by the order dated 05.07.2012 passed in C.W.J.C. No.11328 of 2012 to the Registrar of the Magadh University was to consider the representation dated 16.03.2012 of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order thereon within a period of two months and whatever amount was found due and payable to the petitioner, the same was also to be paid to him within a further period of two months thereafter. In the show cause filed by the opposite parties of Magadh University, the order dated 14.1.2015 has been brought on the

Patna High Court MJC No.201 of 2013 (3) dt.19-02-2016 record, by which the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of.

In the aforesaid view of the matter, the order under contempt has been complied with.

The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) V.P.Sinha/- U