Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6517 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -148 Year- 2016 Thana -PARWALPUR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Arun Kumar, Son of Ramprasad Rai, Resident of Village- Rasalpur Mobarak, P.S. Mahua, Distt. Vaishali. At Present Renter of- Prem Chand Sharma, S/o Late Ganauri Mishtri, At- Parwalpur, P.S. Parwalpur District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 13.12.2016 in connection with G.R. No. 12 of 2016 arising out of Parwalpur P.S. Case No. 148 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event it is submitted that the alleged recovery is of small quantity of 200 grams of Ganja. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Nalanda, Biharsharif in connection with G.R. No. 12 of 2016 arising out of Parwalpur P.S. Case No. 148 of 2016 on the following conditions -

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6517 of 2017 (2) dt.22-02-2017 2/2 (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T