Bhagirath Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11944 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2016 Thana -TARIYANI CHOWK District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Bhagirath Thakur, son of Late Bhola Thakur, Resident of Village- Rajadih, Police Station- Tariyani, District- Sheohar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 22 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Earlier the petitioner has moved before this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.27218 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 15.07.2016 rejected the bail of the petitioner with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year's judicial custody.

The petitioner is in custody since 24.02.2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11944 of 2017 (3) dt.26-04-2017 2/2 Looking to the period of custody, let the petitionerBhagirath Thakur, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar, in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No.22 of 2016 subject to the conditions that:- (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. mother/father/ wife/son of the petitioner;

(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;

(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T