Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64200/2024bail rejected

Chunnu Singh @ Sonu Singh @ Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-16Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64200 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2024 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Chunnu Singh @ Sonu Singh @ Sonu Kumar S/o Dhananjay Singh Resident of Vill- Bangra, PS- Maharajganj, District- siwan. at present resident of village - salarpur, PS- Gautam Budhnagar, District- Noida uttar pradesh ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-12-2024 Heard Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 270/ 2024 dated 23.06.2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 341, 323, 324, 307, 325, 379, 504, 506 read with section 34 of the IPC.

3. As per prosecution case, on 23.06.2024 the petitioner along with other accused persons were constructing house on the ancestral land of the informant and when she objected this petitioner assaulted her by means of pistol causing injury on her head. It is further alleged that when brother-in-law

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64200 of 2024(3) dt.16-12-2024 2/3 of the informant tried to save her, this petitioner assaulted her by knife causing injury on her left hand. The petitioner also assaulted brother-in-law (Devar) of the informant causing injury on his right hand.

4. The main submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner are that in between both the parties there is case and counter case, admittedly, there was a land dispute in between them during the relevant time of the occurrence and petitioner is an injured in the case lodged on behalf of the petitioner's side against the prosecution party.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner.

6. Heard both the sides, perused the F.I.R., impugned order as well as case diary in this case.

7. As per the allegation, the petitioner inflicted knife blows on the informant and her brother-in-law and their injury reports available with the case diary clearly show that they sustained sharp cut injuries, though, their injuries have been opined to be simple in nature but considering the nature of allegation appearing against the petitioner and also the fact that the investigation is pending against him, this court is not inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64200 of 2024(3) dt.16-12-2024 3/3 Accordingly, his prayer stands rejected.

(Shailendra Singh, J) BKS/- U T