← Library
Patna High CourtCR. REV./838/2025withdrawn

Bikash Yadav @ Bikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-18Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.838 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2025 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger ====================================================== 1.

Bikash Yadav @ Bikash Kumar Son of Nand Kishor Yadav Resident of South Shastri Nagar, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger 2.

Bibhishan Kumar Son of Ramji Yadav Resident of village- Hasanganj, P.S.- Safiyabad, district- Munger 3.

Babita Kumari Wife of Praveen Kumar, D/o Nand Kishor Yadav Resident of village- Nista, P.S.-Surayagarha, District - Lakhisarai 4.

Sanjay Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Son of Ashok Kumar Resident of Khaira, P.S.-Kharagpur, District-Munger 5.

Nand Kishor Yadav Son of Late Lakhi Yadav Resident of village- Nista, P.S.-Surayagarha, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Patna 2.

The Superintendent of Police, Munger 3.

The D.S.P., Munger Sadar, Munger 4.

The S.H.O. Kasim Bazar, Munger 5.

The Circle Officer, Munger Sadar, Munger 6.

The I.O. Kasim Bazar P.S. Case no. 119/2025 Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vipin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this revision petition, the police authorities acting beyond the order dated 28.07.2025 passed by the learned I/c Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger attached the house of this petitioner. Though the order of the learned trial court was very much clear that only the houses and portions in

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.838 of 2025(7) dt.18-02-2026 2/2 possession of absconding accused Pappu Yadav (Rakesh Kumar Ranjan) and Gautam Kumar, as shown in the IO's letter dated 26.07.2025, were ordered to be attached under Section 84 of BNSS. Therefore, the petitioners do not want to press the present revision petition and seek permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take appropriate steps in appropriate proceeding.

2. Having regard to the prayer, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to have recourse of law in appropriate proceeding in appropriate forum.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T