← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62503/2025bail granted

Rajendra Ray @ Rajindra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62503 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2025 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Rajendra Ray @ Rajindra Rai S/O Late Ramdat Ray R/O Vill.- Puchhri, P.S.- Baniyapur, Dist.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 118(2), 117(2), 303(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, on 31.05.2025 at around 4 o'clock in the evening, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, assaulted informant and his family members as a result of which four persons sustained injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62503 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, daughter of co-accused Parmeshwar Rai was teased by the family members of informant as a result of which an altercation took place between the parties. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62503 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 235 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T