Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9192/2017bail granted

Umesh Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-02-28Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9192 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -922 Year- 2006 Thana -KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE DistrictKHAGARIA ====================================================== Umesh Ram, son of Late Adhnu Ram, resident of Village Bathnaha Mokama, Police Station Bashnahi, District Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Punam Devi, daughter of Chatri Das, resident of Village - Choti Malia, P.O. Bari Malia, Police Station - Gogri, District - Khagaria. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhaya, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 922C of 2006 lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that marriage was solemnized in the year 2001 and now allegation has been made against the petitioner for the offence alleged, as there was land dispute in the family members and petitioner is in custody since 6.1.2017.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that marriage was solemnized 16 years back and there is general and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9192 of 2017 (2) dt.28-02-2017 2/2 omnibus allegation and he is in custody for one month, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in connection with Complaint Case No. 922C of 2006, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U