Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59387/2025bail granted

Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-14Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59387 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2024 Thana- NIRMALI District- Supaul ====================================================== Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Ray S/o Dinesh Ray R/o vill - Majhari, ward no. 4, P.s. - Nirmali, Distt.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nirmali P.S. Case No. 136 of 2024 dated 03.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 309(6) of the B.N.S.

As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants are alleged to have assaulted the informant and took his motorcycle forcibly.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case only on the basis of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59387 of 2025(2) dt.14-11-2025 2/2 confessional statement of the co-accused persons. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by the this court vide order dated 29.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 267/2025. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 22.03.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Birpur, Supaul in connection with Nirmali P.S. Case No. 136 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T