← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18880/2019disposed

Ramakant Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2021-09-06Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO. 18880 of 2019 ====================================================== Ramakant Mandal son of Late Sahi Mandal, at the resident of villageBarsanda, P.S. Tetia Bumber, District Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Principal Secretary, Karmik Department.

3. Joint Secretary, Karmik Department.

4. Deputy Secretary, Karmik Department.

5. The Commissioner, Munger.

6. The District Magistrate, Munger.

7. Manager, Bank of India, Havelikharapur, Munger. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s State : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, G.P. 5 For the Bank : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-09-2021 The instant case has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "(i) For direction to the authority to credit the Bank

Draft's amount in saving Account along with 18% interest to the petitioner which is not paid till today. (ii) Also for necessary relief/ reliefs order/orders, direction/ directions for which the petitioner will be entitled in the law as well as in the facts of the case." At the outset, the Ld. counsel for the petitioner, in presence of the Ld. Senior counsel for the respondent Bank, Shri Ajay Kumar Sinha, assisted by Shri Ajit Kumar Sinha, Advocate and the learned counsel for the respondent State, Shri Md. Nadim Seraj, G.P. 5, seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the respondent Bank for redressal of his grievances, in view of the fact that the present writ petition is barred by delay and latches.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed, however, with the aforesaid liberty. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/- U T