Niraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62276 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2024 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar ====================================================== Niraj Kumar S/O Nakul Mandal Resident of Village- Milki, Ward No.- 01, P.S.- Barari, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
X D/O Late Z Resident of Village- Sofi Chak Milki, P.S.- Barari, DistrictKatihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 64, 336(3), 61(2), 113(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 126(2), 89, 329(3) and 118(1) of the B.N.S., Section 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The prosecution case, in brief is that on 28.04.2025, when minor daughter of informant was alone at her home, in the meantime, this petitioner, along with other F.I.R. named accused persons, entered into her house, brought the victim to his house for attending a worship ceremony and thereafter, took her to a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62276 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 temple and forcibly got her married with this petitioner. It is further alleged that this petitioner kept the victim in Bhagalpur for one month and committed rape as a result of which the victim got pregnant and thereafter, he gave an abortion pill to the victim which resulted in her abortion and later on, left her at Karhagola station and fled away. The victim in her statement recorded before the police and under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. has supported the prosecution case.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T