Arjun Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20689 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.
Arjun Prasad Son of Kanshi Yadav Resident of New Bus Stand More, Mohalla - Karbigahiya, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Jakkanpur, District- Patna. 2.
Anita Devi Wife of Sachidanand Kumar Resident of New Bus Stand More, Mohalla - Karbigahiya, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Jakkanpur, District- Patna. 3.
Anil Kumar Son of Late Moti Lal Resident of New Bus Stand More, Mohalla - Karbigahiya, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Jakkanpur, District- Patna. 4.
Krishna Prasad Son of Late Pannu Lal Resident of New Bus Stand More, Mohalla - Karbigahiya, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Jakkanpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Collector, Patna.
4.
The Additional Collector, Patna.
5.
The Circle Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajiv Verma, Sr. Adv.
Mr.Gaurav Govind, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 Mr. Arif Daula Siddiqui, AC to SC-25 For the BRPNL :
Dr. Anand Kumar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-04-2023 On account of the efforts made not only by this Court, but also by the learned Standing Counsel No. 25, ultimately, the compensation in lieu of the land, encroached by the Respondent-State and the Bihar State Pul Nirmal Nigam Limited, for the purposes of construction of Mithapur ROB Chiraiyatand flyover via Karbigahiya, has been paid to the petitioners, details whereof have been produced before this
Patna High Court CWJC No.20689 of 2021(10) dt.26-04-2023 2/2 Court and have been taken on record.
The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, Sri Rajiv Verma, submits that now the grievances of the petitioners have more or less been redressed, however, liberty be granted to the petitioners to agitate their subsisting grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Liberty, so sought, is granted. The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U