Md. Aadam @ Md. Adam @ Mohammad Adam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61195 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Md. Aadam @ Md. Adam @ Mohammad Adam Son of Mohammad Yunus Village -Semra Belbatia, P.S. -Turkauliya, District -East Champaran 2.
Syed Tabish Adam @ Md. Faizal @ Tabish Aadam Son of Md. Aadam @ Md. Adam @ Mohammad Adam Village -Semra Belbatia, P.S. -Turkauliya, District -East Champaran 3.
Md. Danish son of Md. Aadam @ Md. Adam @ Mohammad Adam Village -Semra Belbatia, P.S. -Turkauliya, District -East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. On 09.03.2025, the informant was allegedly attacked near his home by seven armed accused, including the petitioners. They assaulted him and attempted to strangulate him. The gold chain of the informant is also said to have been snatched away. The attack was reportedly in retaliation of a prior complaint, lodged by the informant's wife.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61195 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, there is enmity between the parties and most of the cases, mentioned in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition, have been lodged by Hamidun Khatton, who is the maternal sister (bua) of Petitioner No. 1.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant has submitted that it is a fact that all the cases mentioned in paragraph no. 3 have been lodged on the same informant. Petitioner No. 1 has nine criminal antecedents and the Petitioner No. 2 has three criminal antecedents whereas the Petitioner No. 3 has five criminal antecedents. He has further submitted that process under Section 82 of the CrPC has been issued.
6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below and make a prayer for regular bail, which shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.
7. With these observations, the application is disposed of. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T