Dev Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62664 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2025 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== Dev Kumar Choudhary Son of Late Dudhnath Choudhary R/O Village- Bal Bangara, P.S.- Daraunda, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey, Advocate Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Advocate Mr. Shashank Kashyap, Advocate Ms. Sheshadri Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. B.N. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.N. Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 303(2) of the Bharaitya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has assaulted with fasuli thrice to the informant due to which he received injuries and it is further alleged that the petitioner also took Rs.25,000/- and a golden chain and also threatened of dire consequence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is also a counter version of this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the injury

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62664 of 2025(3) dt.28-11-2025 2/2 report it is clear that the informant has received three injuries whereas from perusal of the FIR it is clear that there is allegation of two blows, though the Doctor has opined that the injury appears grievous but it has not been mentioned by the Doctor as to which injury is grievous one. As the informant has received three injuries and there is no specific note from the Doctor as to which injury is grievous is vague. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 15.02.2025.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T