← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1083/2018disposed

Sanjay Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Police ,Bihar, Patna And

2018-07-06Mr. Justice S. Kumar,Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1083 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2018 Thana- KUDRA District- Bhabhua (Kaimur) ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Gupta, son of Sri Kanhaiya Sah @ Kanhaiya Prasad, Resident of Village- Chatra, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Bihar, Patna. null null

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Additional Director General of Police (Head Quarter), Bihar, Patna.

4. The Inspector General of Police, Patna Range, Darbhanga.

5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Shahabad Range, Dehri-on- Sone.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Kaimur (Bhabua).

7. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mohania, Kaimur (Bhabua).

8. The Station House Officer, Kudra Police Station, Kaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. P.N.Sharma, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN) Date : 06-07-2018 Heard.

The petitioner claims that his father is missing for which a first information report has already been lodged with allegation that his father was living with Gurdya Devi for the last 2 - 3 years and she has got the property registered in her name also. It is submitted on behalf of the State that the police is investigating the matter.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1083 of 2018 dt.06-07-2018 2/2 Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others [(2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409 and again affirmed in Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe Versus Hemant Yashwant Dhage and others [(2016) 6 Supreme Court Cases 277].

If the petitioner is aggrieved that proper investigation is not being done then, in terms of the aforesaid decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, he would be at liberty to move before the court concerned.

However, at the same time, the police would be required to investigate the matter and find out the truth expeditiously.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) ( S. Kumar, J) Spd/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.07.2018 Transmission Date N.A.