Krishna Rai @ Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59850 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2025 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Krishna Rai @ Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Kumar son of Late Rajinand Rai Resident of Village- Jitpur, Ps- Chhauradano, Dist- East Champaran 2.

Phool Kumari Devi @ Phool Kumari Wife of Krishna Rai @ Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Kumar Resident of Village- Jitpur, Ps- Chhauradano, Dist- East Champaran 3.

Arun Kumar son of Krishna Rai @ Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Kumar Resident of Village- Jitpur, Ps- Chhauradano, Dist- East Champaran 4.

Jitendar Kumar Son of Krishna Rai @ Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Kumar Resident of Village- Jitpur, Ps- Chhauradano, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suraj Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 76, 352 & 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 30.03.2025 at about 7 PM, these petitioners alongwith 3-4 unknown persons on account of family dispute entered the house of informant and assaulted informant and his daughter-in-law and grand son. They also snatched Rs. 5,000/- from the pocket of informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59850 of 2025(2) dt.04-09-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both parties are agnates and due to land dispute, the scuffle took place, in which, both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Injuries, sustained by the injured, are simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the nature of injury, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T