Raju Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7134 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -350 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIHARI MUFASIL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Raju Sahani, son of Mahendra Sahani, resident of Village- Bochaha, P.S.- Bochaha, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Motihari Mufasil P.S.Case No. 350 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 328, 379, 411 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case as nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is in custody for about six months.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that during the course of investigation the witnesses have stated about the complicity of the petitioner. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7134 of 2017 (3) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

However, trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and try to conclude the same within a period of seven months. If the trial is not concluded within the said period, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U