Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5433/2017bail granted

Alok Singh @ Alok Kumar Singh @ Prince Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-07Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5433 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -335 Year- 2016 Thana -SIWAN CITY District- SIWAN ====================================================== Alok Singh @ Alok Kumar Singh @ Prince Singh, son of Nawal Kishore Singh, resident of Village- Mura, P.S. Basantpur, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 07-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 09.06.2016 in connection with Siwan (Town) P.S. Case No. 335 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is no accusation with regard to theft of the motorcycle attributed to the petitioner. As regards recovery of the stolen motorcycle, Siwan (Town) P.S. Case No. 342 of 2016 has also been registered against the petitioner. It is further stated that the petitioner has already suffered custody for about eight months.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5433 of 2017 (2) dt.07-02-2017 2/2 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Siwan (Town) P.S. Case No. 335 of 2016, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T