Baby Devi @ Bebi Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59981 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Baby Devi @ Bebi Devi W/o Sanjay Kumar R/o Village- Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Nawada Muffasil, District- Nawada 2.

Sarita Devi W/o Shambhu Prasad R/o Village- Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Nawada Muffasil, District- Nawada 3.

Vibha Devi W/o Ranjit Kumar R/o Village- Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Nawada Muffasil, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Diwakar, Adv Mr. Sumit Kumar, Adv Mr. Kundan Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 103(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are women and the informant alleges that her co-villagers Rahul, Ravi Ranjan, Vipin, Gorelal, Pankaj and Prabhat came to her house and called her son Mrityunjay and co-villager Pravesh and took them to Hardiya Asthan and told them that they committed theft

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59981 of 2025(2) dt.15-09-2025 2/3 in their house hence will kill them, further the informant along with her daughter went to Hardiya Asthan where they saw the accused persons including the petitioners along with 10 unknown accused assaulting her son and Pravesh by lathi and danda, accordingly the informant intervened when she along with her daughter were also assaulted and accused fled, thereafter police was informed and the injured were taken to hospital where Mrityunjay died during course of treatment. 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that Petitioner No. 1 instituted Nawada PS Case No. 81 of 2025 against unknown accused alleging theft in her house. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioners, but then they have been implicated in order to coerce male members of the family into submission who are alleged to have participated in the occurrence. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and also taking into consideration the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59981 of 2025(2) dt.15-09-2025 3/3 fact that petitioners are women, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nawada Muffasil P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T