Satyaranjan Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62033 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2025 Thana- Dehri Mufassil District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Satyaranjan Bind S/O Premchand Bind @ Premchand Kevat Resident of Village- Naubatpur, Police Station- Saiyadraja, District- Chandauli (U.P) 2.

Satyendra Kumar S/O Raushan Kewat Resident of Village- Naubatpur, Police Station- Saiyadraja, District- Chandauli (U.P) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

02. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in connection with Dehri (M) P.S. Case No. 101 of 2025 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise act, 2016.

03. As per prosecution case, on the basis of secret information, a City Ride Bus was intercepted and the petitioners who tried to flee away from the bus were apprehended by the police. On search of the bus, recovery of 53.2 liters of country made liquor as well as India made foreign liquor was made.

04. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62033 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/3 the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Admittedly, the recovery has been shown from a City Ride Bus and the petitioners could not be fastened the liability of alleged recovery from a bus. The petitioners are in custody since 09.06.2025 and they are having clean antecedent. Charge-sheet has been submitted.

05. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that recovery has not been shown from the conscious possession of the petitioners and further considering the period of custody of the petitioners and their clean antecedents along with submission of charge-sheet, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No. 1, Rohtas at Sasaram/court concerned in connection with Dehri (M) P.S. Case No. 101 of 2025, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS and the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62033 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 3/3 (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners.

(ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ashish/- U T