Bijay Saw @ Bijay Kumar Saw v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13005 of 2018 ====================================================== Bijay Saw @ Bijay Kumar Saw Son of Krishna Saw @ Sohrai Saw Resident of Village - Jurahi, Lohar Tola, P.S. - Madanpur, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise and Prohibition, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate cum Collector, Aurangabad.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad.
4. The S.H.O. Deo Police Station, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kamlendra Pd. Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Vikash Kumar- SC11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 30-07-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Bajaj Discover Motorcycle) bearing Registration No. BR-26J-0645, which has been seized in connection with Deo P. S. Case No. 19 of 2017 due to violation of the provisions of the Excise Act. It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation/excise/criminal proceedings, vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case. Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the confiscation/excise proceedings and/or
Patna High Court CWJC No.13005 of 2018(2) dt.30-07-2018 2/2 criminal case, the vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on the petitioner furnishing two surety bonds to the satisfaction of District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation/excise proceedings and/or criminal case so as to create third party rights or prejudice the rights of the State in the pending proceedings.
The vehicle in question be released within one week from the date of furnishing the surety bonds. Valuation of the vehicle shall be done as per insurance document. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T