← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2265/2015disposed

Ashok Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Naresh Kumar Sharan The Principal Secretary Land Acquisition Departme

2019-03-06Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2265 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14039 of 2013 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Mishra, Son Of Late Rameshwar Mishra, Resident Of Village - Rasiyari, P.S. - Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Naresh Kumar Sharan The Principal Secretary Land Acquisition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, The Secretary, Land Acquisition Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3.

Mr. Kumar Ravi, The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Darbhanga 4.

Mr. Dinesh Prasad, The Additional District Magistrate, Darbhanga 5.

Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, The District Consolation Officer-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Darbhanga 6.

Mr. Suresh Kumar, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Biraul, District - Darbhanga 7.

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, The Circle Officer, Block Kiratpur, District - Darbhanga ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Devendra Kr Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-03-2019 No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present.

Learned counsel for the State submits that in compliance of the order dated 07.07.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14039 of 2013, the opposite party no.5 has passed a reasoned order on the application filed by the petitioner on 25.01.2016, as such, this petition has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid submission, this proceeding is

Patna High Court MJC No.2265 of 2015(9) dt.06-03-2019 2/2 dropped.

However, the petitioner, if so advised, may take proper steps against the order, which has been passed against him.

With this observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/ S. Katyayan U