M/S Laxmi Int. Udyog v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16475 of 2016 ====================================================== M/s Laxmi Int. Udyog son of Late Chandra Bhushan Singh, Resident of Village- Parsha, P.S.- Araria Sangram O.P., District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Collector cum District Magistrate, Madhubani 2.
The Circle officer, Phulparas, District- Madhubani. 3.
The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.
4.
The Dy, S.P. Bisfi, District- Madhubani.
5.
The Officer In Charge, Bisfi Police Station District- Madhubani. 6.
The Chowikdar, Bisfi Police Station, District- Madhubani. 7.
The District Industries Officer, Madhubani.
8.
The District Manager, District Industries Centre, Madhubani. 9.
The Chairman Sri Subhash Chandra Singh Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Belton Bhawan, Shastri 10.
The Member Secretary, Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Patna. 11.
The District Mining officer, Madhubani, District- Madhubani. 12.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For State :
Mr.Dhurjati Kr. Prasad- Gp14 :
Ms. Jahan Ara, Ac to Gp 14 For Resp. No. 9 and 10 :
Mr. Shivendra Kishore, Sr. Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 06-05-2024 This Court vide order dated 11.01.2024 directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner as the counsel for the petitioner is no more. Accordingly, Registry had issued notice to the petitioner which was duly served upon the petitioner.
2. On 23.04.2024, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. For giving a fair opportunity, the case was
Patna High Court CWJC No.16475 of 2016(6) dt.06-05-2024 2/2 adjourned to 30.04.2024. Today, the case is listed for hearing. The petitioner has not made any effort to appear. Office note disclose that Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner was not filed.
3. Therefore, question of hearing the matter on behalf of the petitioner does not arise and the matter stands dismissed for default and non-prosecution.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amitkr/- U