Surendra Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6882 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -122 Year- 2015 Thana -CHIRAIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Surendra Kumar Thakur Son of Kedarnath Thakur, Resident of VillageBirta Tola, P.S.- Chiraiya, District- East Champarn .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. B.N. Mishra For the Informant :
Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-04-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Chiraiya P.S.Case No.122 of 2015 for the offence under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is a School Teacher and he is named in this case, as a dispute is going on between the informant and the petitioner with respect to management of the School and further, it is submitted that though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and it is alleged that a statement was made by the deceased himself but the author of the statement is one Umesh Prasad and Umesh Prasad in his statement before the Police in Para 13 of the case diary has stated that he
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6882 of 2017 (3) dt.03-04-2017 2/3 saw total five persons from the place of occurence, out of them three persons on the Motorcycle but there is only one injury on the person of the injured and the petitioner is in custody since 21.10.2016.
Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that there is only one gut shot injury on the person of the deceased and it is also stated in para 13 of the case diary that he had seen five persons fleeing from the place of occurrence and one co-accused has also confessed that he shot the deceased. Considering all aspects of the matter, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahna at Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Chiraiya P.S.No.122 of 2015 .
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6882 of 2017 (3) dt.03-04-2017 3/3 (iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U