Guddu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11611 of 2017 (3) dt.17-05-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11611 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2003 Thana -THAKRAHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Guddu Yadav son of Shiv Yadav resident of village Binahi, P.S. Thakaraha (Bhitaha O.P.), District West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17.05.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

It would appear from the report of the trial court that except doctor and I.O. almost all prosecution witnesses have already been examined and, therefore, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and, again, his prayer for bail in connection with Session trial no. 708/2014 arising out of Thakraha (Bhitaha) P.S. Case no. 41/2003 stands rejected.

However, a copy of this order be sent to Superintendent of Police, Bagaha with direction to him to ensure the presence of doctor and I.O. of Thakraha (Bhitaha) P.S. Case no. 41/2003 corresponding to Session trial no. 708/2014 before Addl. Sessions Judge I, Bagaha, West Champaran within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if they have not been examined before the trial court as yet and after examination of doctor

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11611 of 2017 (3) dt.17-05-2017 and I.O, the concerned court must dispose of the above stated sessions trial within two months from the date of examination of last prosecution witness.

shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T