Anil Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72824 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2013 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan ====================================================== ANIL RAM S/o Amla Ram R/v- Sohagara Purab Patti, P.S.- Guthani, DistrictSiwan .. ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumari Anupam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 27 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant with his son arrived to the house of Santosh Tiwary, several accused persons armed with various weapon reached there and on order of co-accused Satyadev Ram, accused persons started to abuse and shot fire as a result of which three persons got injured and taken to Sadar Hospital, Siwan where Suresh Kumar was declared dead by doctor and remaining two were under treatment.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72824 of 2022(3) dt.18-04-2023 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to local enmity as . No specific allegation of assault is attributed to the petitioner. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. He has no criminal antecedent. Similarly situated other accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by another coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 5.5.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19405 of 2016 and vide order dated 29.6.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19263 of 2016. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 8.7.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ADJ III, Siwan in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No. 96 of 2013. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U