Chandan Mallik @ Chandan Dhankar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12691 of 2017 (2) dt.08-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12691 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -108 Year- 2016 Thana -LAUKHI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Chandan Mallik @ Chandan Dhankar Son of Shambhu Dhankar@ Ram Lal Dhankar Resident of Village- Nirmali , Ward No. 8, P.S.- Nirmali, DistrictSupaul. Permanent Address- Resident of Village- Misrouliya, P.S.- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, two motorcycle borne criminals snatched Rs. 99,650/-, papers of vehicles, driving license, voter I. D. and mobile of the informant at the point of pistol. The informant claimed to identify one miscreant after seeing who was of small height.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is not named in the first information report, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession, the name of the petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of co-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12691 of 2017 (2) dt.08-04-2017 accused Raj Kumar Yadav @ Pintu Yadav, he has not been put on test identification parade and is suffering in custody since 09.09.2016.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur in connection with Laukhai P.S. Case No. 108 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T