← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66128/2024dismissed

Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-24Mr. Justice Praveen Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66128 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2022 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Meena Devi Wife of Vakil Chaudhari @ Vakil Chaudhary village- Ward No 13, Bharthapati P.S -Yogapatti (Nawalpur), District -West Champaran 2.

Vakil Chaudhari @ Vakil Chaudhary son of Late Jag Chaudhari villageWard No 13, Bharthapati P.S -Yogapatti (Nawalpur), District -West Champaran 3.

Baliram Chaudhary Son of Vakil Chaudhari @ Vakil Chaudhary villageWard No 13, Bharthapati P.S -Yogapatti (Nawalpur), District -West Champaran 4.

Kamlesh Chaudhari Son of Dhrup Chaudhari @ Dhrup Chaudhriy villageWard No 13, Bharthapati P.S -Yogapatti (Nawalpur), District -West Champaran 5.

Jokhu Chaudhary Son of Dhrup Chaudhariy @ Dhrup Chaudhari villageWard No 13, Bharthapati P.S -Yogapatti (Nawalpur), District -West Champaran 6.

Rajendra Chaudhaari @ Rajendra Chaudhary Son of Late Madan Chaudhaari village- Ward No 13, Bharthapati P.S -Yogapatti (Nawalpur), District -West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Hiralal Mahto Son of Late Belas Mahto village- Bharthapati, P.S -Yogapatti (Nawalpur op), District -West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2026 Heard the parties.

2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for petitioners submits that the stage of the case has changed and the trial is at the fag end, hence, he intends to withdraw this application.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66128 of 2024(2) dt.24-03-2026 2/2

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Praveen Kumar, J) Jyoti/- U T