← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42143/2014bail granted

Shashi Bhusan Singh @ Shashi Bhushan Singh @ Shashi Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-19Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42143 of 2014 Arising Out of P.S. Case No. -215 Year- 2013 Thana -MANJHI District- SARAN ====================================================== Shashi Bhusan Singh @ Shashi Bhushan Singh @ Shashi Singh S/o Sri Nagendra Singh, Resident of Mohalla Dahiyawa Tola, P.S. Chapra Town, District Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. as a suspect along with four other unknown persons. The petitioner is the Seizure of Tata Motors Finance Company Limited. The informant alleged that the petitioner had telephoned him about his default in making payment of installments of loan. It is submitted that the petitioner is well-acquainted with the informant but the informant did not name the petitioner nor identified the petitioner. Merely because the petitioner works as the Seizure of Tata Motors Finance Company Limited, the informant suspected the hands of the petitioner. It is submitted that during the course of investigation, none of the witnesses has supported the factum of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42143 of 2014 (3) dt.19-05-2015 2/2 the occurrence and disclosed about the theft or robbery of any vehicle from a busy place. The informant might have concealed his own vehicle for claiming insurance money. Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor did not point out any material against the petitioner after perusal of the case diary. It is found that the petitioner has not ever telephoned the informant as it appears from Para 29 of the case diary. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra in Manjhi P.S. Case No. 215/2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T