Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8910/2017bail granted

Ravindra Manjhi @ Kundan v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-02-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8910 of 2017 (2) dt.23-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8910 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -344 Year- 2016 Thana -BODHGAYA District- GAYA ====================================================== Ravindra Manjhi @ Kundan, Son of Late Mahesh Manjhi, Resident of village - Mastipur, P.S. Bodhgaya, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Urmila Devi, D/o Nanhak Manjhi, resident of village - Jayrampur, P.S. Dobhi, District - Gaya .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 23-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 05.09.2016 in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 344 of 2016, Tr. No. 01 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and this is the first complaint raised by the petitioner's wife since they were married in the year 2008. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody since 05.09.2016 already suffered, let the petitioner above named be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8910 of 2017 (2) dt.23-02-2017 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. XI, Gaya in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 344 of 2016, Tr. No. 01 of 2016 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii)That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. Chandran/BT (Vikash Jain, J) U T