Priyanka Anjalani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13047 of 2023 ====================================================== Priyanka Anjalani Wife of Sri Santosh Kumar, Resident of Village-Khori Pakar, Muzaffarpur, Police Station-Sahebganj, Post Office-Bishunpur Kalyanpur, Pin No. -843125, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director (I.C.D.S.) Integrated Child Development Services, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Collector cum District Magistrate, (I.C.D.S.) Muzaffarpur. 4.

The District Programme Officer, Integrated Child Development Services, Muzaffarpur.

5.

The Child Development Project Officer, Sahebganj, Muzaffarpur. 6.

Pramila Kumari, Wife of Sri Munna Kumar, Resident of Village-Khori Pakar, Muzaffarpur, Police Station-Sahebganj, Post Office-Bishunpur Kalyanpur, Pin No. -843125, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Kumari Amrtia (Gp3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order (s), direction (s) in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent concern to conduct the District Programme Officer, Integrated Child Development Services, Mujafferpur in light of letter no. 2487/ Pro, dated 31-10-2020 in Case No. 112/2020 (Centre No. 274) for

Patna High Court CWJC No.13047 of 2023(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/2 selection of Aganbari Sevika, in ward no. 10, village- Khoripakar, Panchayat- Bisunpur Kalyan, BlockSahebganj, DistrictMuzaffarpur as well as District Magistrate, (I.C.D.S.), Muzaffarpur have been cancelled without any proper and genuine cause and action."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U