Sone Lal Mandal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.21322 of 2011 dt.03-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21322 of 2011 =========================================================== Sone Lal Mandal Son Of Late Chhedi Mandal Resident of Village-Ram Nagar Ismilepur, Paschami Bhitha, P.O.-Raghuni Tola, P.S. Ismilepur, DistrictSamastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Deputy Development Commissioner, District and Village Development Agency Bhagalpur, District-Bhagalpur.

2. The District Magistrate Bhagalpur, District-Bhagalpur.

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Naugachia, Distt. Bhagalpur.

4. The Block Development Officer, Ismilepur, District-Bhagalpur.

5. Programme Officer, Office of Programme Officer Ismilepur, DistrictBhagalpur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. AMRENDRA KUMAR,ADV For the Respondent/s : Mr. DHURJATI KR PRASAD GP7 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 13.07.2011 issued by the Block Development Officer, Ismilepur, District Bhagalpur by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit rest amount of undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State

Patna High Court CWJC No.21322 of 2011 dt.03-10-2018 Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 05.10.2018 Transmission Date NA