Hind Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65809 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2025 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Hind Kumar Yadav S/o Ram Ekbal Yadav R/o Village- Kakardobha, P.S.- Laukahi, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pravashankar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 87 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 317(5), 317(4) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The prosecution case is that during routine vehicle checking, police received information about stolen motorcycles and apprehended the petitioner, who confessed that he and Manish Kumar Mandal were involved in theft and sale of motorcycles. Acting on this, police also caught Manish Kumar Mandal and recovered a stolen red Apache motorcycle from his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65809 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 possession.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 05-05-2025. Petitioner bears two criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no concern with the alleged occurrence. As is evident from perusal of the FIR itself, that motorcycle is recovered from possession of co-accused. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, manner of petitioner's implication and there being no recovery from the petitioner's possession, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65809 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 87 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T