← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16893/2015dismissed

Ram Naresh Bhatt v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-09-01Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16893 of 2015 ====================================================== Ram Naresh Bhatt S/o Late Churhu Roy, Resident of Village- Rajpura, P.S.- Kalar, District- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Zonal Manager, Zonal Officer, Punjab National Bank, R. Block, Chanakya Tower, Patna 3.

The (C.M.D.) Chairman cum Managing Director Vikhajee Kama Palace, New Delhi. Punjab National Bank.

4.

The Regional Manager, Regional Officer, District- Gaya B 370 A..P. Colony, Gaya. Punjab National Bank 5.

C.I.R. Circle Officer, Gaya A.P. Colony, Gaya, Punjab National Bank. 6.

F.Z.M., Field General Manager, R. Block Chanakaya Tower, Patna Punjab National Bank.

7.

The District Magistrate D.M. District Aurangabad 8.

The Treasury Officer, District- Aurangabad ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Kumar, Adv.

For the PNB :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Ram Ganesh, Adv.

Mr. Vibhuti Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-09-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ commanding the petitioner has prayed for direction of payment of family pension to the second wife from respondent. According to Nomination of Name entered in pension Book as per spouse in the P.P.O. (hereinafter referred

Patna High Court CWJC No.16893 of 2015(2) dt.01-09-2023 2/2 to as Act of family pension) (ii) For that wife Smt. Raj keshi Devi she has died in harness on 18th of April, 2001.

(iii). For that she is now to more in the worth child and not any dependent as her and no other legal heir. So in which reason or condition the petitioner has action to payment of pension in favour of second wife."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U