Patna High CourtCWJC/11261/2012rejected

Bhachak Yadav @ Bhachak Gope v. Most.Chandramani Devi And ORS

2015-12-03Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11261 of 2012 ====================================================== BHACHAK YADAV @ BHACHAK GOPE, SON OF LATE LAKSHMI GOPE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KAKO BIGHA, MAGHRA, P.S.- DEEPNAGAR, DISTRICT-NALANDA.

.... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

1. MOST.CHANDRAMANI DEVI, W/O LATE RAMOTAR MALAKAR

2. RAJENDRA MALAKAR

3. DEVENDRA MALAKAR

4. UPENDRA MALAKAR ALL SONS OF LATE RAMOTAR MALAKAR.

ALL (1) TO (4) ARE RESIDENT OF MAUZA MAGHRA, P.S. DEEPNAGAR, DISTRICT-NALANDA.

5. KISHORI GOPE, SON OF LATE SHREE GOPE.

6. MUNNI GOPE, SON OF RAMDEO GOPE.

7. RAM PRASAD MAHTO, SON OF TIPPAN MAHTO.

8. CHANDRADEO PASWAN, SON OF JANKI PASWAN

9. SAHODARI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE BASO MAHTO.

10. BINOD MAHTO, SON OF LATE ISHWAR MAHTO.

ALL (5) TO (10) ARE RESIDENTS OF MAUZA-MAGHRA SARAI TOLA INDIRA AWAS KAKO BIGHA, P.S.-DEEPNAGAR, DISTRICT-NALANDA.

11. ARVIND KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE BABU KHORI SINGH

12. ANIL KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE BABU KHORI SINGH. BOTH (11) & (12) ARE RESIDENTS OF MAUZA-MAGHRA, P.S.- DEEPNAGAR, DISTRICT-NALANDA.

13. SIYA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE LAKSHMI GOPE.

14. BABLOO GOPE, SON OF LATE LAKSHMI GOPE BOTH (13) & (14) ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KAKO BIGHA, MAGHRA, P.S.-DEEPNAGAR, DISTRICT-NALANDA.

15. SMT. INDU DEVI, D/O LAKSHMI GOPE, WIFE OF SANJAY GOPE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAGHRA, P.S.-DEEPNAGAR, DISTRICT-NALANDA

16. BACHAN GOPE, SON OF LATE SHREE GOPE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAGHRA SARAI, TOLA INDIRA AWAS KAKO BIGHA, P.S.-DEEPNAGAR, DISTRICT-NALANDA.

.... .... RESPONDENT/S ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 03-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The photocopy is not to be admitted in evidence as is not a secondary document hence is not

Patna High Court CWJC No.11261 of 2012 (8) dt.03-12-2015 permissible in the eye of law and that being so, the prayer of the petitioner is found misconceived and is accordingly rejected. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) PN/- U