Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Kumar Keshari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1224 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2019 Thana- NARAINPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Kumar Keshari, Son of Rajendra Prasad Keshari, Resident of Village-Dagar Par Narayanpur, P.S.-Narayanpur, DistrictBhojpur. 2.

Rajendra Prasad Keshri, Son of Devi Dayal Keshari, Resident of VillageDagar Par Narayanpur, P.S.-Narayanpur, District-Bhojpur. 3.

Rita Devi, Wife of Rajendra Prasad Keshri, Resident of Village-Dagar Par Narayanpur, P.S.-Narayanpur, District-Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suraj Narain Yadav, Advocate Ms. Anushri, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.P.N. Sharma, A.C. to A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 26-08-2019 Having heard Ms. Anusri, who prays for an adjournment, we are not inclined to grant the same keeping in view the facts of the present case where all the three petitioners are accused in a criminal case where the allegations against them are of having committed an offence under Section 304B read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Their bail applications appeared to have been rejected on 26th of June,

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1224 of 2019(2) dt.26-08-2019 2/2 2019 and 25th of July, 2019 by the courts below. In the aforesaid background, we do not find it necessary to entertain submissions with regard to the confinement which is alleged to be unlawful without any remand order.

Once the bail application has been rejected, it is open to the petitioners to approach for the higher court with regard to same. For the reason aforesaid, we do not entertain this application at this stage. It is accordingly rejected. (Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T