Ajesh Kumar Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2761 of 2015 In LPA No. 708 of 2014 ====================================================== Ajesh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Shyam Sundar Singh, Resident of VillageSohagpur, P.S.- Mirganj, District - Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through Commandant 87 BN C.R.P.F., A.O.I., Raipur, Chhatisgarh

2. The Commandant 87, C.R.P.F., Raipur, Chattisgarh

3. The Inspector General of C.R.P.F., Bihar Sector, C.R.P.F., Patna, Bihar

4. The Deputy Inspector General of C.R.P.F., Muzaffarpur, Bihar, Patna

5. Sri Brahma Roy Son of Not Known Hawaldar, 87 BN, C.R.P.F., Raipur, Chhatisgarh at present Commandanm 87 BN C.R.P.F., Unchathal Chriban, Manipur, District - Manipur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. (Dr.) Shashi Shekhar Kishore, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) 26-10-2016 For non-compliance of the order in regard to issuance of notice to Respondent No. 5, the letters patent appeal stood dismissed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that notices with correct address of Respondent No. 5 was filed though belatedly.

Be that as it may, let L.P.A. No. 708 of 2014 be restored to its original file. The processes filed for

Patna High Court MJC No.2761 of 2015 (2) dt.26-10-2016 2/2 issuance of notice to respondent no. 5 would be utilized for the purpose.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Arjun/Rajesh U