Chanky Pandey @ Mrityunjay Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20981 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -140 Year- 2014 Thana -BETTIAH CITY DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Chanky Pandey @ Mrityunjay Kumar Pandey, Son of Om Prakash Pandey, Resident of Village Satbhirwa, and Present residing at Village Chailabhar, Chaita, P.S. Majhaulia, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 140 of 2014, registered under Sections 307, 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in course of investigation one Golu Kumar was apprehended by the Police mere on suspicion, who disclosed the name of this petitioner having hand in the present case and thereafter, the petitioner was remanded in this case on 26.10.2016 from Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 139 of 2014. Further submission is that informant has disclosed the name of four culprits in the F.I.R saying that two unknown persons were also there, but

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20981 of 2017 (2) dt.17-05-2017 2/2 petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. while he is in custody in the preset case from 26.10.2016.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 140 of 2014. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T