Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22560 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2015 Thana -KAKO District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Sunil Yadav Son of Chaneshwar Yadav @ Chandeshwar Yadav R/o Village - Dharhara, P.S. - Kako, District - Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kako P.S.Case No.106 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is brother-in-law ('Dewar') of the deceased and the case is for dowry death.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather there is general and omnibus allegation and he is in custody for more than three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22560 of 2017 (2) dt.12-05-2017 2/2 named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Kako P.S.Case No.106 of 2015.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U