Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65271 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2024 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Singh S/o- Sri Rabindra Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Fatehpur, P.S.- Didarganj, Dist- Patna 2.
Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar Singh Son of Sri Rabindra Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Fatehpur, P.S.- Didarganj, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Chandrashekhar Azad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-11-2024 Heard Mr. Chandrashekhar Azad, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned A.P.P. for the State and Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 448, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including the petitioners and 6-7 unknown persons assaulted the informant's side by means of butt of pistol and other weapons.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65271 of 2024(3) dt.21-11-2024 2/2 case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained grievous injury. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that both sides have sustained grievous injury, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No.119 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T