← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/562/2022dismissed

Radha Krishna Prabhat v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-27Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.562 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6898 of 2018 ====================================================== Radha Krishna Prabhat, Son of Late Mithila Prasad, resident of VillageSonmai, P.S. Dhanarua, District-Patna, the retired Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, S.B.A.N. College, Darheta, Lari, District-Arwal. ... ... Appellant.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through the Registrar. 5.

The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 6.

The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

7.

The Principal, S.B.A.N. College, Darheta, Lari, District-Arwal. ... ... Respondents.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Apurva Kumar, AC to GA-12.

For he University :

Mr. Sunit Kumar, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 27-01-2025 I.A. No.1 of 2022:

Heard.

2. There is a delay of about 22 days in filing the present L.P.A. No.562 of 2022.

3. For the reasons stated in I.A. No.1 of 2022 read with the affidavit, delay of about 22 days in filing the present

Patna High Court L.P.A No.562 of 2022 dt.27-01-2025 2/2 L.P.A. No.562 of 2022 stands condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No.1 of 2022 stands allowed.

L.P.A. No.562 of 2022:

4. Appellant's grievance is that while working as a Lecturer, he has earned Time Bound Promotion and it is to be treated as promotion to the post of Reader. The same cannot be considered for the reasons that Time Bound Promotion granted to such of those employees stagnated in a particular post for 10 to 12 years, Depending upon the Scheme of Time Bound Promotion, they are entitled to have the benefit of Time Bound Promotion. Granting or extending Time Bound Promotion does not amount to promotion to the next higher cadre. Therefore, we find no infirmity in the order of the learned Single Judge dated 22.08.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No.6898 of 2018.

5. Accordingly, the present L.P.A. No.562 of 2022 stands dismissed.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) P.S./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.01.2025.

Transmission Date NA