← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23220/2017bail granted

Jai Prakash Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-22Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23220 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -256 Year- 2016 Thana -DHURAIYA District- BANKA ====================================================== Jai Prakash Sah son of Late Kamaldhari Sah Resident of Village - Laxmi Kitta, Police Station - Dhoraiya, District - Banka. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Najmul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-05-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in para-1 of the bail application during course of the day.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added. The allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the informant (deceased), which resulted into his death and also taken away Rs. 2000/- from the pocket of the informant (deceased). It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 07.03.2017. The charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23220 of 2017 (2) dt.22-05-2017 2/2 witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The case was instituted for an offence under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently after twenty days, the informant had died and then Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added on 16.01.2017. Thereafter the bail of the petitioner was cancelled. Thereafter the petitioner prepared revision application against cancellation of bail before the Hon'ble High Court. The said order of cancellation was set aside vide Cr. Rev. No. 290 of 2017 dated 16.03.2017 but in the meantime the petitioner was arrested and was taken into judicial custody. General and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioner.

On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Banka, in connection with Dhoraiya P.S. Case No. 256 of 2016. (Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/-