Prem Kumar Bhardwaj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20914 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Prem Kumar Bhardwaj resident of Village- Sanda, P.S. Tikari, DistrictGaya. 2.

Ranjeet Kumar son of Ramakant Sharma resident of Village- Harna, P.S. Tekari, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Bihar Police Sub- Ordinate Service Commission through its Secretary, Santosh Manson, B. Block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna. 5.

The Chairman, the Bihar Police Sub- Ordinate Service Commission, Santosh Manson, B. Block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna. 6.

The Officer on Special Duty, the Bihar Police Sub-Ordinate Service Commission, Santosh Manson, B. Block, Raghunath Path, Danapur, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nagendra Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. Nadim Seraj (GP-5) Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, AC to GP-5 For the BPSSC :

Mr. Kunal Tiwary, Advocate Mr. Aniket Singh, Advocate Mr. Anupam Raj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. That this is an application for selection of the petitioner on the post of S.I. A.S.J. in Police department in State Govt by way of selection in the examination which has been held under the Advertisement No. 1/2019 recruitment of police S.I./ Sergeant/ASJ

Patna High Court CWJC No.20914 of 2021(2) dt.03-04-2024 2/2 (Direct).

1/A May kindly direct the respondent authorities to maintain the status-quo in terms of selection of other candidates which final list had been prepared despite of lesser mark than that of petitioners."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U