Md. Saddam Ansari @ Md. Saddam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22361 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2017 Thana -JALALGARH District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Md. Saddam Ansari @ Md. Saddam Son of Sultan Ansari, Resident of Village+ P.S.- Jamalpur, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2017 Heard both sides.

The petitioner seeks bail in Jalalgarh P.S. case No. 14 of 2017 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that three persons came on a motor cycle when he was returning to his house and looted away his scooty, mobile, Adhar Card and other articles. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of petitioner figured in the case during the course of investigation. Although looted mobile was recovered from the possession of the petitioner but SIM of Md. Naim was used in the aforesaid mobile. It is submitted that Md. Naim is father-in-law of the petitioner and his father-inlaw handed over the mobile to the petitioner but it appears that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22361 of 2017 (3) dt.28-06-2017 2/2 looted mobile was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after remaining six months in custody.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T