Mandakini Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21056 of 2021 ====================================================== Mandakini Kumari Wife of Sudhir Kumar, Resident of Village-Kazichak, Police Station-Sarmera, District-Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director Integrated Child Development Scheme, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Nalanda, District-Nalanda. 4.

The Additional Collector, Nalanda, District-Nalanda. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Sarmera Block Sarmera, District-Nalanda. 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Sarmera, District-Nalanda. 7.

Sujita Kumari, Wife of Guddu Prasad, Resident of Village-Kazichak, Police Station-Sarmera, District-Nalanda.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.K. Mandal (Sc3) Mr.Arjun Prasad, AC to SC-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(I) That this Writ Petition is being filed on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of an appropriate order/orders/direction/directions/ writ in the nature of Certiorari to set aside the Order dated 07.12.2018 passed by the District Magistrate, Nalanda in Case No. 427110207041801158/2A (Mandakini Kumari Versus The State of Bihar and others) whereby and where under the petitioner has challenged the order of the Additional Collector, Nalanda by which the appointment of the Respondent No. 7 is wrong and

Patna High Court CWJC No.21056 of 2021(2) dt.03-04-2024 2/2 not proper in accordance with law.

(II) And further be pleased to issue appropriate order/orders/ direction/direction/writ in the nature of Mandamus directing and commanding the post of Aganwari Sevika at Kazichak Ward No. 6, Gram Panchayat Mir Nagar, Block Sarmera, DistrictNalanda with all the consequential benefits."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U